AIRBUS All rights reserved. REFERENCE: VLG MSN EC-MLE QRH. Intentionally left blank. A/A/A TRANSMITTAL LETTER. airbus QRH. Uploaded . /// QRH VOL.3 REV THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE AIRCRAFT AS KNOWN BY AIRBUS INDUSTRIE. Airbus AAA – Quick Reference Handbook. Uploaded by rafaelldalpra . THE CROSS REFERENCE BETWEEN/// QRH VOL.

Author: Kigabar Faukora
Country: Mauritania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 1 September 2013
Pages: 445
PDF File Size: 5.95 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.50 Mb
ISBN: 305-6-49296-393-8
Downloads: 26642
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Brajora

Aviation Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled. Sign up using Email and Password. Home Arbus Tags Users Unanswered. Depending on the actual landing distance with failure, the flight crew can decide whether or not a diversion is necessary. He wasn’t following proper procedure at all.

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Machavity 2, 2 5 It is a function of number of engines – in a four-engined aeroplane, the chance of all airus engines failing is assumed to be super extremely incredibly unlikely.

If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user.

In airbys movie Sully we have this section of dialogue He wasn’t following proper procedure at all. If the flight crew wants to take into account the benefit of the reverse thrust at landing, the Actual Landing Distance with failure must be computed by multiplying the two following parameters: When a failure occurs, and after performing the ECAM actions, the PNF must refer to the bottom of the applicable Summary page below the Go-Around sectionin order to determine the landing distance that takes into account the failure.

Retrieved from ” https: This strategy may include s320 phases and each phase includes action steps that may be linked to a pre-condition i. This will allow x320 early detection of a possible action slip or omission. More than in any other document, clear and unambiguous layout ergonomics is paramount in the QRH in order to avoid any:.


To fulfil its objectives, the QRH reflects a high degree of presentation ergonomics in order to be error-resistant in the challenging context of the simulator airbjs training or real world during line operation. In the qeh Sully we have this section of dialogue. However, when the QRH revisions have been incorporated in accordance with the information given in the Preliminary Pages, these pages do not bring operational added value and therefore are no longer useful in the QRH binder for any operational purposes.

When both pilots have to respond, “BOTH” is indicated. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Quick Reference Handbook (QRH) – SKYbrary Aviation Safety

A VREF table is provided in the summary. He probably knew a relight was not going to happen so quite a bit can be skipped outright. Procedures are written for the least unlikely events, and updated according to events that actually happened.

APU will probably be off during cruise, and given the choice to re-light an engine or to light the APU it aibrus clearly the engine that is the most beneficial to qrrh. Now that a dual engine failure during take-off has actually happened, updating the procedures will be the result of failure analyses: Email Required, but never shown. Now, another question discusses the importance of the APU to the crashbut my question is, why is it so far down the list?

The Quick Reference Handbook QRH contains all the procedures applicable for abnormal and emergency conditions in an easy-to-use format. All-engine-failure in airliners is very very unlikely. He switched on the APU immediately after engine blowback. Something that would not be easy to program an AI pilot to do, or think about. In addition, performance data corrections are also provided for specific conditions.

Starting the APU is actually the 11th item on the checklist for dual engine failure, and quite a few items can be skipped like the relight attempt, oxygen masks, notifying ATC, etc.


What does Airbus consider more important in their handbook? So very uncommon that the only practical consideration would be a w320 mode failure from external causes, such as the volcanic ash cloud. The design and development of the QRH is critical to the airus response to appropriate situations. Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy aairbus and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

If he had followed the damn rules, we’d all sirbus dead. It’s not particularly an error on Airbus’ part, if it is before the oxygen mask stuff, and that failure happened at high altitude, then there’s a risk of hypoxia. The PF shall respond after having checked the existing configuration. Sign up using Facebook. Here are the excerpts from the QRH for the Aairus engine failure. The assumption was that a multiple engine failure happens at altitude, airbuss instance in cruise while flying through volcanic ashes.

I suspect the above is dramatized somewhat, but it does seem odd that it’s so low. Numbering and index A, B, Why is powering on the APU so low on the A emergency checklist?

A320 QRH Bold Title, color title box, etc?

And it’s not just technobabble? This is where memory items and training and common sense come in. Post as a guest Name. It wasn’t Star Trekwhere the names are made up, and the points don’t matter.

This happened to British Airways Flight 9 and to KLM flightwith all four engines switching q320 due to the ash cloud.

Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.